The following is the content of an email I sent to the PIO
(Public Information Office) of the United States Supreme Court on the occasion of
their ruling in April of 2025 that the massive invasion of illegal aliens
should enjoy the protection of a Writ of Habeas Corpus before being deported
back to their own country.
Habeas
Corpus is a fundamental facet of American law that defends the American
population from unlawful imprisonment.
It requires that an individual's imprisonment be reviewed by a judge to confirm its
lawfulness.
This email to
the court was sent using this Subject Line:
A question for Chief Justice John R. Roberts Jr. and was based on Article I, Section 9, Paragraph 2 of The Constitution of the United States. The content of the email follows.
~
Mr. Chief Justice,
If, for example, an invading
army, assembled by a conglomerate of our foreign enemies, launched an all-out
assault on America's west coast? And, if our forces were able to repel
that invasion and, in the process, capture a great multitude of their
soldiers? Could we not detain and then return those captured soldiers to their own country without a
habeas corpus hearing for each one?
Sir, in essence, this is the true reality of
what has recently happened to this nation. And, I believe it simply cannot be
adequately reconciled with the right of habeas corpus. And, because this
massive force of invaders did not wear uniforms or carry overt weapons changes
nothing. They, themselves, are the weapons, intended by their
nefarious sponsors to destroy our way of life.
With all due respect, sir, in
failing to make a difference between the status quo of an alien individual's
illegal border crossing and this forceful, highly orchestrated, en
masse invasion - one specifically intended to do terminal harm to
this nation, I believe the court has made by its recent ruling, what will quickly prove to be an immeasurably costly mistake.
In short, it seems the court simply
conceptualized the wrong reality. This is a new thing. And, it is
not a thing that can ever be reconciled with the idea of individual
rights. This is truly a seditious social invasion force. And, if we
do not rise above and find more effective and truly applicable legalities to
deal with this deadly invasive tactic, we are surely doomed as a nation.
I implore the court, please revisit your ruling and find that better legal
insight which will more effectively safeguard our worthy way of life.
Respectfully, from just "a man
on the street," Larry Burnett
